A Liar Does What A Liar Does When A Liar Is Caught In Her Lie -

Liar Liz Bennett

One thing about liars is that they are predictable. 

When a liar is caught telling a lie, the liar will either deny it was a lie or avoid dealing with it. 

When an honest person, a person of integrity and decent character, makes a mistake and the mistake is brought to their attention, an honest person, a person of integrity and decent character, will examine the mistake carefully, reflect on it and, if they were genuinely wrong, admit it, apologize and make amends.

People make mistakes every day.

There is no shame in it.

However, when a liar tells a lie and he or she is caught in it and the lie is fundamental to his or her position, then he or she is in deep trouble. To admit making a lie is to forfeit everything, career, position as a judge, credibility, dignity, respect from one's peers and ultimately self respect. 

Liar Nicole Garson

A liar can deny it but, if the truth is obvious, as it is in the case of the lies told by British Columbia Court of Appeal Justices Elizabeth Bennett Mary Saunders and Nicole Garson in their scandalously fraudulent judgment given in the case of Gregory N. Harney Law Corporation v Aggleland Holdings Inc and others, then the liar will usually engage in what psychologists call "avoidance coping".

In psychology, avoidance coping, escape coping, or cope and avoid is a maladaptive coping mechanism characterized by the effort to avoid dealing with a stressor. Coping refers to behaviors that attempt to protect oneself from psychological damage.

Liar Mary Saunders

So when John English detected what he thought was a deliberate lie in the judgement of British Columbia Court of Appeal Justices Elizabeth Bennett, Mary Saunders and Nicole Garson made July 17, 2016, he applied to court for a reconsideration based on what was a clear error of fact in the reasons for judgment.

In response, if the judges had been honest people, persons of integrity and decent character, they would have examine the allegation off a mistake carefully, reflect on it and written about it in their reasons for judgment on the reconsideration motion for all the world to see what it was they had been mistaken upon and, if the mistake was incidental and of no consequence then the judgment would not change and the public would have confidence in their judgment but if the mistake was fundamental then they would change the judgment and again the public would have confidence in their judgment.  

Click here to read the 8 paragraph judgment issued September 28, 2016 on the reconsideration motion and notice that the facts Mr. English claims are incorrect are never referred to. 

Remember that Mr. English is claiming that the amended account was not delivered and served as the judges originally wrote in paragraph 44 of their first judgment.

Click here to read paragraph 44 of the original judgment made June 17, 2016

Unfortunately, British Columbia Court of Appeal Justices Elizabeth Bennett, Mary Saunders and Nicole Garson did not do what one expects of honest people or persons of integrity and decent character and they engaged in "avoidance conduct" by issuing new reason for judgment that avoid any reference to the actual mistake of fact thereby proving that their judgment is a fraud and that they are under threat and intimidation by British Columbia Investment Management Corporation or some other very powerful group of persons.

Because British Columbia Investment Management Corporation wants this property

  
 And British Columbia Investment Management Corporation will do what it has to get rid of the owners:

    Destroy their business buildings

  And some politicians will benefit from this property as part of their pension plan assets.

MONEY AND POWER CONTROL THE BRITISH COLUMBIA COURTS

LEARN MORE ABOUT PUBLIC SERVICE CRIME IN BRITISH COLUMBIA

WWW.BCIMC.INFO